One may wonder how much would our salaries be if there
weren’t collective agreements and other regulations to protect the workers. The
image is perhaps familiar to all those engaged in the so called left winged
defense of public services, as a counter image. In these ranks there is a
widespread notion that capitalist earnings are based on the exploitation of
workers in the sense of having them with lower wages and worse working
conditions. What capitalists misappropriate this way would amount to the
illegitimate part of their profits in a company (it is no longer affirmed that
it would amount to the bulk of those profits). But one should ask himself if
there cannot be an interest on the part of the companies and capital owners
that workers are well provided so that their job can yield more. We are told
that in such a case, it is a matter of holding back the social unrest. We
cannot deny something of that sort, mainly in countries with a totalitarian
trend. But the point, dishonestly overlooked by all those that scorn at Marx’s
prediction of a continuous increase of the exploitation of the working class,
is that work yields more when done by workers skilled and well paid than when done by
the host of precarious population precariously trained. And this is the step
lacking: it yields more, and that means that it is subject to a bigger
exploitation. This is the real interest that supports and justifies the concern
of governments with education, one should rather say, to block the dangerous
ambivalence in the word, the concern with high professional qualification. Without
that, no real job market, but an artificial one held up by a hunchbacked
eyesore, a restricted competence in a mixture of company and totalitarian
State, a company offering services to the bigger and more powerful companies in
the international arena. This is probably the case for each and every one of
the countries in the world (maybe qua countries), whose battle is perhaps no
longer an external one for the enlargement or protection of the national
territories, that is markets, but an internal one for the provisional
maintenance of a legal and social reliability to accommodate the investments
and to provide the expected kind of workers. The big market is still using a
diversity of false markets that disguise it.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario